How ISO 42001 Works: Core Principles & Requirements

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most powerful forces shaping business today. From automated decision-making and customer service chatbots to predictive analytics and generative tools, AI is becoming embedded in everyday operations.

But with opportunity comes risk. Concerns around bias, explainability, data misuse, and accountability are growing. Regulators are moving fast, and customers increasingly expect organisations to use AI responsibly.

That’s where ISO 42001 comes in. Published in late 2023, it is the world’s first standard for an AI Management System (AIMS). Built on the Annex SL framework—used by other well-known ISO standards such as ISO 9001 (quality) and ISO 27001 (information security)—ISO 42001 provides a clear, structured, and internationally recognised framework for governing AI.

This blog breaks down how ISO 42001 works, clause by clause, and what it means for your organisation.

Understanding the Structure of ISO 42001

ISO 42001 mirrors the same high-level structure as other ISO management system standards. That means if your organisation already follows ISO 9001 or ISO 27001, you’ll find many familiar requirements that can be integrated.

However, it goes further by addressing the unique risks, ethical challenges, and lifecycle requirements of AI systems.

Here’s how the clauses work in practice:

1. Organisational Context (Clause)

Every AI system exists within a wider environment of stakeholders, regulations, and business objectives. ISO 42001 requires organisations to clearly define:

• Which AI models, tools, and processes fall under scope
• The data sources used (structured, unstructured, third-party)
• Relevant internal and external drivers (laws, ethics, customer expectations, market risks)

For example, a healthcare provider deploying diagnostic AI must consider not just technical functionality but also patient safety, medical regulations, and societal trust.

2. Leadership (Clause 5)

Effective AI governance depends on commitment from the top. Leadership responsibilities include:

• Setting and communicating AI policies
• Assigning roles and responsibilities for AI oversight
• Providing resources to maintain the AIMS
• Ensuring AI principles align with the organisation’s mission and values

Without leadership support, AI initiatives risk becoming ad hoc or siloed—leaving organisations exposed to compliance gaps or reputational harm.

3. Planning (Clause 6)

AI projects introduce specific risks such as:

• Bias in training data leading to unfair outcomes
• Lack of explainability undermining stakeholder trust
• Privacy and security threats from data misuse
• Regulatory non-compliance as laws evolve

ISO 42001 requires organisations to establish objectives and create plans to manage risks and opportunities. This might mean integrating fairness testing into model development, building escalation paths for high-impact decisions, or defining clear thresholds for when human intervention is required.

4. Support (Clause 7)

Even the most robust AI governance framework fails without the right support. Clause 7 ensures organisations provide:

• Adequate resources (time, budget, tools)
• Staff training and upskilling on AI governance issues
• Clear communication strategies to build awareness across teams
• Documented processes so governance is consistent and auditable

Think of it as building AI literacy into the organisation—ensuring not only developers but also business leaders, HR, and customer service teams understand the implications of AI.

5. Operation (Clause 8)

Clause 8 addresses the AI lifecycle, requiring organisations to maintain control over:

• Development (data quality, design choices, validation)
• Procurement (third-party AI tools must meet governance requirements)
• Deployment (impact assessments before roll-out)
• Monitoring (continuous performance evaluation, bias checks, and drift detection)
• Retirement (securely decommissioning outdated or unsafe models)

A practical example: A financial services firm using AI for credit scoring must ensure bias is monitored continuously—not just at launch—and that outdated models are retired responsibly.

6. Performance Evaluation (Clause 9)

AI governance is not “set and forget.” Organisations must measure performance using:

• KPIs and metrics (accuracy, fairness, transparency indicators)
• Internal audits of AI systems and governance processes
• Management reviews to ensure leadership oversight
• Stakeholder feedback to refine approaches

This clause ensures that lessons learned are systematically captured and applied.

7. Improvement (Clause 10)

Finally, organisations must show that they learn from mistakes and adapt. Clause 10 requires:

• Root cause analysis of incidents, nonconformities, or complaints
• Corrective actions to prevent recurrence
• Continuous improvement of the AIMS as technologies, threats, and regulations evolve

For instance, if an AI-powered recruitment tool generates complaints about discriminatory outcomes, the organisation must investigate, fix the issue, and improve controls to stop it happening again.

Annex A: AI-Specific Controls

Beyond the core clauses, Annex A introduces targeted controls to deal with the most pressing AI governance challenges, such as:

• Data management: ensuring data quality, integrity, lineage, and security
• Model lifecycle: from development to retirement, with built-in monitoring and accountability
• Human oversight: ensuring explainability and traceability of AI decisions
• Third-party AI: proving external providers meet your governance standards
• Impact and risk assessment: evaluating effects on individuals, society, and business continuity
• Bias and fairness: testing models for unintended discrimination
• Safety and scalability: ensuring models perform reliably under changing conditions

These controls are essential for proving responsible AI practices to regulators, customers, and stakeholders.

Key Features of ISO 42001

• Establishes a comprehensive AI Management System (AIMS)
• Covers leadership, policies, data governance, risk management, and lifecycle controls
• Designed for integration with existing ISO standards like ISO 9001 and ISO 27001
• Built on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) model for continual improvement
• Enables independent certification, giving organisations global recognition for responsible AI use

Still have questions?  Let’s chat.

ISO 42001 and the PDCA Cycle

ISO 42001 follows the familiar PDCA cycle:

• Plan: Define AI governance objectives, risks, and processes
• Do: Implement policies, allocate resources, and operate the AIMS
• Check: Audit, measure, and review performance
• Act: Correct problems, adapt to changes, and improve continuously

This approach ensures that your AI governance system isn’t static—it evolves with business needs, emerging technologies, and shifting regulations.

Why ISO 42001 Matters

AI is advancing faster than most organisations can keep up with. Without governance, businesses risk:

• Regulatory fines or compliance failures
• Reputational damage from bias or unethical outcomes
• Security breaches and data misuse
• Loss of trust from customers, employees, and stakeholders

ISO 42001 offers a solution: a globally recognised, certifiable framework for managing AI responsibly. It not only supports compliance but also demonstrates to clients, regulators, and the public that your organisation takes AI ethics and risk seriously.

By adopting ISO 42001, businesses can strike the balance between innovation and responsibility, unlocking the potential of AI while protecting their brand and building trust.

To get customised support specific to your organisation, please get in touch with us.

Whether you’re just exploring AI governance or ready to begin your ISO 42001 journey, our experts can help. Reach out today for tailored guidance.

About Us 

Candy Management Consultants has guided UK businesses through stress-free ISO certifications since 2017. Our 100% first-pass success rate comes from tailoring frameworks to your operations and personalised approach – not checklists, at fixed day rates, transparent per-project contracts and with the help of the modern ISO management software.