What Are the Common Challenges in Implementing ISO 42001?
ISO 42001 is a new management system standard designed specifically for Artificial Intelligence (AI). With AI becoming deeply embedded in industries ranging from healthcare to finance to logistics, organisations are under increasing pressure to ensure responsible, ethical, and reliable use of these technologies. ISO 42001 sets out a framework to help businesses establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an AI Management System (AIMS).
But as with any new standard, implementation doesn’t always come easily. Businesses are often eager to demonstrate compliance, but the road to certification can present several hurdles. Let’s look at some of the most common challenges organisations face when implementing ISO 42001 and why recognising them early can make the journey much smoother.
To get customised support specific to your organisation, please get in touch with us.
Lack of Awareness and Understanding
ISO 42001 is still relatively new. Many organisations don’t fully understand what the standard requires or how it applies to their AI systems. Unlike more established standards such as ISO 9001 or ISO 27001, there’s limited guidance, fewer case studies, and less practical experience available.
The challenge: Leaders may struggle to grasp the scope, leaving project teams unsure where to start. Employees may also see it as “another compliance exercise” rather than a way to genuinely improve the governance of AI.
How to overcome it: Early training and awareness campaigns across the organisation are essential. Everyone from developers to senior management should understand not only the requirements but also the why behind them, particularly the ethical, legal, and reputational risks AI poses if left unchecked.
Data Management Complexities
AI relies heavily on data, and ISO 42001 places significant emphasis on responsible data use. Organisations must show that their data is accurate, relevant, unbiased, and managed securely.
The challenge: Many businesses already struggle with data silos, poor quality datasets, and inconsistent data governance. Introducing AI into the mix makes these problems even more complex. Ensuring that training datasets are free from bias, privacy breaches, or inaccuracies is a huge task.
How to overcome it: Implement strong data governance frameworks alongside ISO 42001. This may involve revisiting data collection practices, improving documentation, and carrying out regular bias and fairness assessments.
Ethical and Legal Ambiguity
AI regulation is evolving rapidly. Different regions have different rules on privacy, algorithm transparency, and accountability. For example, the EU AI Act introduces risk-based categories, while other countries are still developing their approaches.
The challenge: Organisations may not know how to align ISO 42001 with shifting global laws and ethical expectations. The risk is that businesses overcomplicate their systems or, worse, fall short of compliance when the regulations catch up.
How to overcome it: Treat ISO 42001 as a flexible framework, not a tick-box exercise. Build in processes for regular review of legal updates and ethical guidelines. Engage legal and compliance teams early to make sure your AI practices stay aligned with emerging rules.
Integrating with Existing Management Systems
Many businesses already follow other ISO standards, like ISO 27001 for information security or ISO 9001 for quality. ISO 42001 is designed to integrate well with these, but in practice, blending a new standard into existing processes can feel overwhelming.
The challenge: Teams may feel burdened by duplicate documentation, conflicting priorities, or additional audits. Smaller organisations in particular may lack the resources to manage yet another layer of compliance.
How to overcome it: Take a harmonised approach. Where possible, align ISO 42001 processes with existing systems instead of creating parallel structures. For example, if you already run risk assessments under ISO 27001, extend the methodology to include AI-related risks rather than inventing a brand-new process.
Technical Transparency and Explainability
A core principle of ISO 42001 is ensuring AI systems are explainable and transparent. This sounds simple, but when you’re dealing with complex machine learning models, especially deep learning, explaining “why” an algorithm made a decision is notoriously difficult.
The challenge: Businesses often find it hard to strike the right balance between model performance and explainability. Black-box models may deliver high accuracy but little interpretability, while simpler models may be easier to explain but less effective.
How to overcome it: Invest in explainable AI (XAI) techniques and ensure documentation is thorough. Transparency doesn’t mean exposing proprietary algorithms but being able to demonstrate that decisions are traceable, accountable, and ethical.
Cultural Resistance
Implementing ISO 42001 isn’t just about policies and procedures, it’s about shifting how people think about AI. Employees may resist new governance requirements, seeing them as slowing down innovation or adding red tape.
The challenge: Developers and product teams may feel restricted, while leadership may struggle to justify the costs without seeing immediate ROI.
How to overcome it: Foster a culture where responsible AI is viewed as a competitive advantage, not a barrier. Highlight case studies of companies that have faced reputational damage due to poor AI practices, and show how compliance can build customer trust.
Resource Constraints
Like any management system, ISO 42001 requires time, expertise, and financial investment. For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), this can be particularly tough.
The challenge: Many SMEs lack in-house AI specialists or compliance teams. The costs of training, documentation, system upgrades, and external audits can feel overwhelming.
How to overcome it: Start small. Focus first on high-risk AI applications and gradually expand coverage. Leverage external consultants or industry bodies where in-house expertise is limited, and prioritise processes that deliver both compliance and business value.
Final Thoughts
Implementing ISO 42001 isn’t easy, and it’s not meant to be. The standard exists because AI presents complex, high-stakes risks that require more than ad-hoc solutions.
The challenges organisations face, from data management to cultural resistance, are significant but not insurmountable. With the right mindset, ISO 42001 can become more than just a compliance requirement, it can serve as a powerful framework for building trust, ensuring fairness, and creating long-term resilience in the age of AI.
If your organisation is considering ISO 42001, recognising these hurdles early is the first step towards overcoming them. With careful planning, collaboration, and commitment, you can turn the challenges into opportunities, ensuring your AI systems are not only compliant but also trustworthy, ethical, and future-ready.
Ready to Take the Next Step?
Implementing ISO 42001 doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Our consultants can guide you through the process, helping you address challenges, streamline implementation, and build a robust AI Management System.
Get in touch today to find out how we can support your ISO 42001 journey.
About Us
Candy Management Consultants has guided UK businesses through stress-free ISO certifications since 2017. Our 100% first-pass success rate comes from tailoring frameworks to your operations and personalised approach – not checklists, at fixed day rates, transparent per-project contracts and with the help of the modern ISO management software.
